The prices of precious metals, particularly gold and silver, experienced a sharp decline on Friday amid a wave of market uncertainty triggered by political developments in the United States. The announcement that Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve official known for a hawkish stance, would succeed Jerome Powell as the Federal Reserve Chair sent shockwaves through the financial markets, causing a sell-off in metals that had previously seen strong gains. This swift drop highlights how sensitive the markets remain to shifts in monetary policy expectations and geopolitical tensions, even in a year when metals had already surged significantly.
Metal Price Movements and Market Reaction
The most notable change occurred in silver markets, where prices plummeted, paring earlier substantial losses. By early Friday morning, spot silver had fallen by around 10.6% to roughly $103.81 an ounce, after experiencing a dramatic sell-off where it dropped more than 16% earlier in the day, even dipping below the $100 level. This decline marked a stark reversal from the rally it experienced over the past year, where silver was up over 150% in 2025, and it continues to reflect heightened volatility in the precious metals sector.
Gold was not spared from the turbulence, losing roughly 5.7% during the session, with prices down to around $5,136.27 an ounce. Earlier in the day, gold saw a decline of as much as 7%. Futures contracts for gold and silver also suffered, with front-month gold futures down by 3.4% on the New York spot market, and silver futures for February delivery plunging by 10%. The broader market environment saw platinum fall more than 10%, with palladium dipping close to 8%, underscoring a widespread retreat across precious metals.
The Political and Monetary Policy Backdrop
The catalyst behind this sudden market reaction was President Donald Trump’s official nomination of Kevin Warsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve. Warsh, who served on the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis and is known for his hawkish views, was seen by markets as a potential shift towards a more aggressive monetary tightening stance. This contrasted with the expectations that had previously favored Kevin Hassett, the current National Economic Council Director, as the likely successor.
Market analysts suggested that the announcement led to a reassessment of the Federal Reserve’s policy trajectory, which in turn affected investor sentiment toward safe-haven assets. Kevin Guha of Evercore ISI commented that the market was “trading Warsh hawkish,” noting that this shift might stabilize the dollar but also brings increased risk of volatility and market whipsaws. Guha emphasized that while Warsh is seen as a pragmatist rather than an ideologically hawkish figure, his appointment raises uncertainty about future policy and its impact on inflation, interest rates, and the dollar.
“The Warsh pick should help stabilize the dollar some and reduce (though not eliminate) the asymmetric risk of deep extended dollar weakness by challenging debasement trades – which is also why gold and silver are sharply lower,” Guha explained. However, he warned against overcommitting to a hawkish stance across asset markets, anticipating some risk of market volatility or “whipsaw” as investors adjust to new expectations.
This political shift unfolded amid ongoing geopolitical tensions, which have historically bolstered precious metals. Claudio Wewel, an FX strategist at J. Safra Sarasin, pointed to recent geopolitical developments, such as the U.S. detention of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the threats of military intervention in Greenland and Iran, as factors that initially supported safe-haven assets earlier in the year. However, he noted that speculation about the Fed chair nomination was now a dominant influence, and the market was pricing in a more dovish scenario than the one that actually materialized.
Historical Trends and Year-to-Date Performance
Remarkably, the year 2025 marked a turning point for gold and silver, with both metals reaching record highs driven by global instability, dollar weakness, and concerns over monetary policy. Gold surged by 65%, while silver saw an extraordinary rally of 150%. These gains spilled into 2026, with silver rising by an additional 45% and gold posting a 19% increase so far this year. Despite this impressive performance, the recent sell-off illustrates how quickly investor sentiment can shift, especially when central bank policies and geopolitical risks collide.
The sell-off was mirrored across the stock markets as well. In Europe, the Stoxx 600 Basic Resources index—comprising some of the continent’s biggest mining companies—fell by about 2%. Silver’s biggest producer, Fresnillo, saw its shares decline by 4%, though they later recovered some ground. On Wall Street, silver miners like Endeavour Silver tumbled 9%, while Coeur Mining dropped 8%. Silver ETFs also experienced significant declines; the ProShares Ultra Silver fund was down more than 22%, and the iShares Silver Trust ETF fell by 11.2%.
This widespread decline across equities and ETFs highlights how delicate the market’s optimism has become, despite miners and metals producers still trading well above their historical averages. The recent corrections reflect a broader trend of profit-taking and reassessment following a period of extraordinary gains.
Underlying Factors Driving the Precious Metals Market
Several core factors have contributed to the dramatic increase in gold and silver prices over the last year, making their recent declines noteworthy. An array of geopolitical tensions, including U.S. foreign policy interventions and international conflicts, elevated the appeal of safe-haven assets like gold and silver. Simultaneously, the decreasing value of the U.S. dollar, driven by monetary easing measures and inflation concerns, supported higher metal prices.
Market analysts like Katy Stoves from Mattioli Woods pointed out that the recent sell-off could be a “market-wide reassessment of concentration risk.” She explained that the metals rally had become somewhat crowded, with investors piling into gold and silver based on sustained narratives of inflation hedging and monetary policy uncertainty. When these crowded positions unwind, sharp corrections can occur even for previously strong assets.
Toni Meadows from BRI Wealth Management added that gold’s rally to the $5,000 level had perhaps been “too easy,” noting that the stabilization of the dollar was contributing to the recent decline. He highlighted that ongoing central bank buying had driven long-term prices higher but had slowed in recent months, indicating potential headwinds for further gains. Nevertheless, he maintained that the case for reserve diversification had not disappeared, especially given ongoing geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and the risk of countries losing confidence in U.S. assets.
Silver’s performance, closely tied to gold, is expected to mirror broader market trends. With the dollar stabilizing and broader risk-off sentiment abating somewhat, metals faced pressure, yet many experts believe their outlook remains fundamentally bullish over the medium term, given the persistent global economic and geopolitical risks.
Implications for Investors and Future Outlook
The recent price swings highlight the complexity of trading in precious metals. While both gold and silver had built significant bullish momentum in 2025 and early 2026, the swift correction shows how sensitive these markets are to shifts in policy expectations and geopolitical events. Investors now face a nuanced environment: the long-term fundamentals remain supportive, yet near-term volatility is likely to persist.
Many analysts advise caution. The significant gains of the past year have created crowded positions, which increases the risk of sharp corrections, especially if market perceptions of central bank policies change abruptly. As Katy Stoves mentioned, “even good assets can sell off as positions get unwound,” emphasizing the importance of diversified strategies in uncertain times.
Looking ahead, market experts see potential for continued strength in precious metals but with the caveat that traders should remain alert to policy signals and geopolitical developments. The Federal Reserve’s future approach, especially under Warsh’s leadership, will be pivotal. His hawkish reputation could mean tighter monetary policy, strengthening the dollar and putting downward pressure on metals in the short term, although longer-term tailwinds from geopolitical risks and inflation concerns remain intact.
In conclusion, while the immediate reaction to Warsh’s nomination caused a substantial dip, the broader narrative backing gold and silver remains resilient. Investors should carefully weigh the risks of a volatile environment against the metals’ role as a hedge against economic and geopolitical shocks. The coming months will be critical in determining whether this correction is a simple pause or signals the beginning of a longer-term shift in precious metals trends.